ARNOLD MURRAY

BROTHER PETE | home

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ARNOLD MURRAY

(video version)

In addressing his critics on his own website regarding this demonic deception Arnold Murray himself admits: "What about teaching Serpent Seed? I make no apology for teaching the Word of God."

http://www.shepherdschapel.com/critics.htm

Murray makes a big deal out of the Koine Greek term "sperma":

the seed

New Testament Greek Definition:

4690 sperma {sper'-mah}

from 4687; TDNT - 7:536,1065; n n

AV - seed 43, issue 1; 44

1) from which a plant germinates

1a) the seed i.e. the grain or kernel which contains within itself

the germ of the future plants

1a1) of the grains or kernels sown

1b) metaph. a seed i.e. a residue, or a few survivors reserved as

the germ of the next generation (just as seed is kept from the

harvest for the sowing)

2) the semen virile

2a) the product of this semen, seed, children, offspring, progeny

2b) family, tribe, posterity

2c) whatever possesses vital force or life giving power

2c1) of divine energy of the Holy Spirit operating within the

soul by which we are regenerated

Sure enough, the Koine Greek word is "sperma" so since the word resembles our 20th century English "sperm" Murray's followers run around youtube claiming "See, it's the literal sperm of Satan!" So (the spirit being) Satan literally had sex with Eve and impregnated her with his literal sperm. So then we aren't all created in the image of God, as He declared it, after all.

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

So Murray's followers believe that some of us are the physical literal offspring of Satan in Satan's image. This even though if Murray's followers had looked at the very first definition it says "from which a plant germinates". Since when do plants produce human sperm? The use is obviously metaphorical.

Ah but then if we go down to the second definition we see reference to literal semen. So let's employ an adjacent hermeneutic and see if we can find another use of that term "sperma" in the Koine Greek in a similar context:

Romans 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed [sperma] of David according to the flesh;

If Murray's followers didn't "have any doubt at all" about the possibility of the term being used metaphorically, then it would follow that they must necessarily believe that David who lived a thousand years before her, literally had sex with Mary, through which Jesus was conceived. In other words, the touchstone and primary pillar of Murray's false presumptions are removed. Do we wonder why he felt the need to first turn to the New Testament in order to exegete Genesis, rather than simply turning to Genesis 4:1 in which Eve specifically declares that Cain was "of the LORD"?

Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

When presented with this single verse that entirely deconstructs Murray's "doctrine of devils" his followers will demonstrate it is exactly that by actually telling you that Eve lied! But then scripture tells us we can expect such as this:

1Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

So who really got begiled?

2Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or [if] ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with [him].

It wasn't Eve but rather Arnold Murray's followers who got beguiled! Not a single follower of Arnold Murray, has been able to point to a single other person in history, that teaches that the Kenites not only survived the flood, but comprise a significant portion of the world's population today. A group that Satan created in his image.

2Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

All evil people are of Satan.

Another straw man. Who wouldn't believe that the serpent was of Satan - or was Satan?

For more in the Millennium of Revelation chapter 20 please visit this video link, or click on the annotation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3wri1cq7l8

Another straw man. What Christian would say "oh that's difficult" when scripture states that the serpent is the devil? None would.

What people? How about a few examples of people that would "have a difficult time of understanding a sentence like that"? None.

More insulting of his straw man that doesn't exist.

But it's not complicated for anybody. Now we will see the purpose of his method.

So he pretends there is a relationship between a person agreeing that when the bible says that the serpent is the devil, that it must somehow necessarily follow that one must believe in Murray's unique spin on an old heresy. But the two are unrelated. Through his set-up and repetition he beguiles weak minded people into believing there is some sort of relationship where none exists. Is this a form of brainwashing?

No Jesus didn't teach Murray's unique serpent seed doctrine! So his weak minded followers are indoctrinated to believe that if you don't think Jesus taught Murray's Murray's doctrine of devils then you must believe that Jesus is "not nice"?

So now if you don't believe Murray's childish devil having sex with Even story then you are immature!

But in anyone who accepts this doctrine of devils that is absent from the church throughout the Christian era, as well as being conveniently used by Hitler in the genocide of millions of Jews, then you are not a disciple of Jesus and you don't accept His teachings. But Arnold Murray speaks for Arnold Murray and his unique Kenite spin an evil Gnostic doctrine.

But it is Arnold Murray that is hiding from the truth of Genesis 4:1.

No, he didn't. But certainly all false doctrine is of the enemy. What Arnold Murray has done through his "doctrine of devils" is create a fictitions group of people that his followers hate. A group of people that have Satan's genes. As you chat with his followers you will find that the way they point the finger primarily at those they label "fake Jews". On further investigation you will find that the most distinguishing feature of this group are that they are Zionists. So basically all Zionists, whether Christians or Jews are members of his fictitious modern-day physical "Kenite" lineage. They also toss in Jews as demonized by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion that may or may not be Zionist. Yet when your point out the other fruit of the anti-Zionist tree for some reason they become non-responsive. This even as Murray teaches of fruit.


	BROTHER PETE \| home ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ARNOLD MURRAY (video version) In addressing his critics on his own website regarding this demonic deception Arnold Murray himself admits: "What about teaching Serpent Seed? I make no apology for teaching the Word of God." http://www.shepherdschapel.com/critics.htm Murray makes a big deal out of the Koine Greek term "sperma": the seed New Testament Greek Definition: 4690 sperma {sper'-mah} from 4687; TDNT - 7:536,1065; n n AV - seed 43, issue 1; 44 1) from which a plant germinates 1a) the seed i.e. the grain or kernel which contains within itself the germ of the future plants 1a1) of the grains or kernels sown 1b) metaph. a seed i.e. a residue, or a few survivors reserved as the germ of the next generation (just as seed is kept from the harvest for the sowing) 2) the semen virile 2a) the product of this semen, seed, children, offspring, progeny 2b) family, tribe, posterity 2c) whatever possesses vital force or life giving power 2c1) of divine energy of the Holy Spirit operating within the soul by which we are regenerated Sure enough, the Koine Greek word is "sperma" so since the word resembles our 20th century English "sperm" Murray's followers run around youtube claiming "See, it's the literal sperm of Satan!" So (the spirit being) Satan literally had sex with Eve and impregnated her with his literal sperm. So then we aren't all created in the image of God, as He declared it, after all. Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. So Murray's followers believe that some of us are the physical literal offspring of Satan in Satan's image. This even though if Murray's followers had looked at the very first definition it says "from which a plant germinates". Since when do plants produce human sperm? The use is obviously metaphorical. Ah but then if we go down to the second definition we see reference to literal semen. So let's employ an adjacent hermeneutic and see if we can find another use of that term "sperma" in the Koine Greek in a similar context: Romans 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed [sperma] of David according to the flesh; If Murray's followers didn't "have any doubt at all" about the possibility of the term being used metaphorically, then it would follow that they must necessarily believe that David who lived a thousand years before her, literally had sex with Mary, through which Jesus was conceived. In other words, the touchstone and primary pillar of Murray's false presumptions are removed. Do we wonder why he felt the need to first turn to the New Testament in order to exegete Genesis, rather than simply turning to Genesis 4:1 in which Eve specifically declares that Cain was "of the LORD"? Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. When presented with this single verse that entirely deconstructs Murray's "doctrine of devils" his followers will demonstrate it is exactly that by actually telling you that Eve lied! But then scripture tells us we can expect such as this: 1Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; So who really got begiled? 2Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or [if] ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with [him]. It wasn't Eve but rather Arnold Murray's followers who got beguiled! Not a single follower of Arnold Murray, has been able to point to a single other person in history, that teaches that the Kenites not only survived the flood, but comprise a significant portion of the world's population today. A group that Satan created in his image. 2Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. All evil people are of Satan. Another straw man. Who wouldn't believe that the serpent was of Satan - or was Satan? For more in the Millennium of Revelation chapter 20 please visit this video link, or click on the annotation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3wri1cq7l8 Another straw man. What Christian would say "oh that's difficult" when scripture states that the serpent is the devil? None would. What people? How about a few examples of people that would "have a difficult time of understanding a sentence like that"? None. More insulting of his straw man that doesn't exist. But it's not complicated for anybody. Now we will see the purpose of his method. So he pretends there is a relationship between a person agreeing that when the bible says that the serpent is the devil, that it must somehow necessarily follow that one must believe in Murray's unique spin on an old heresy. But the two are unrelated. Through his set-up and repetition he beguiles weak minded people into believing there is some sort of relationship where none exists. Is this a form of brainwashing? No Jesus didn't teach Murray's unique serpent seed doctrine! So his weak minded followers are indoctrinated to believe that if you don't think Jesus taught Murray's Murray's doctrine of devils then you must believe that Jesus is "not nice"? So now if you don't believe Murray's childish devil having sex with Even story then you are immature! But in anyone who accepts this doctrine of devils that is absent from the church throughout the Christian era, as well as being conveniently used by Hitler in the genocide of millions of Jews, then you are not a disciple of Jesus and you don't accept His teachings. But Arnold Murray speaks for Arnold Murray and his unique Kenite spin an evil Gnostic doctrine. But it is Arnold Murray that is hiding from the truth of Genesis 4:1. No, he didn't. But certainly all false doctrine is of the enemy. What Arnold Murray has done through his "doctrine of devils" is create a fictitions group of people that his followers hate. A group of people that have Satan's genes. As you chat with his followers you will find that the way they point the finger primarily at those they label "fake Jews". On further investigation you will find that the most distinguishing feature of this group are that they are Zionists. So basically all Zionists, whether Christians or Jews are members of his fictitious modern-day physical "Kenite" lineage. They also toss in Jews as demonized by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion that may or may not be Zionist. Yet when your point out the other fruit of the anti-Zionist tree for some reason they become non-responsive. This even as Murray teaches of fruit.