Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - PeteWaldo

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39
1
http://thefederalistpapers.org/founders/john-quincy-adams/jqa-describes-islam

"In “John Quincy Adams: A Bibliography,” compiled by Lynn H. Parsons (Westport, CT, 1993, p. 41, entry#194), there is a section named “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War and on Greece,” (The American Annual Register for 1827-28-29 (NY: 1830). In that section, Adams had the following to say about Islam:

The natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran…

This is in stark contrast to his view of the Christian religion:

The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. […]

One sentence in particular stands out in his commentary about the Islamic ideology. And boy, it is hard-hitting…

In the 7th century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab … spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. … He declared undistinguishing and exterminating war as a part of his religion. … The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust, to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.”"

http://thefederalistpapers.org/founders/john-quincy-adams/jqa-describes-islam

2
‘Brotherhood Using Deep Web to Open New Front in US’

A former Egyptian government minister says the Muslim Brotherhood is using the deep web to raise funds for operations in the U.S. and possibly to purchase weapons. That’s according to the Egyptian weekly el-Fagr, which interviewed (Arabic link) former deputy interior minister Mohammad Nour el-Din.

El-Din said the Brotherhood uses those parts of the internet that don’t appear in search engines (Google, etc.) to fundraise. Much of this effort is via Bitcoin, a worldwide cryptocurrency and digital payment system.

The former minister, who is a security expert, suggested the organization could well be purchasing rockets and mortars and hiring mercenaries via the deep web as well.

The newspaper item says the Muslim Brotherhood is attempting to establish “a new Islamist front in the U.S.” and elsewhere but currently lacks sufficient funding. This is despite recent reports of the large sums of money transferred to the Brotherhood, particularly from Qatar and Turkey."
https://clarionproject.org/muslim-brotherhood-uses-deep-web-to-raise-funds-buy-arms/

3
"‘National Duty to Rape Girls in Revealing Clothes’
By Meira Svirsky Sunday, November 5, 2017

Speaking about a proposed bill to tighten the anti-prostitution laws in Egypt on a televised debate, lawyer Nabih Wahsh outraged his audience when he stated:  “Are you happy when you see a girl walking down the street with half of her behind showing? … I say that when a girl walks about like that, it is a patriotic duty to sexually harass her and a national duty to rape her.”"

video on link
https://clarionproject.org/nation-duty-rape-girls-revealing-clothes/

5
Debate: "What Is the Quran's View of the Christian Scriptures?" (David Wood vs. Shabir Ally)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKqe8fKhfXg

http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Osama/zawadi_mhd_torah.htm

7
From this list:
https://nsnbc.me/tag/fluoridation/

"Fluoridation Convert: A Scientist Explains What Changed Her Mind

Jane Nielson, Ph.D (nsnbc) : Steering Committee Member, Sonoma County Water Coalition Board member, Open-space, Water, and Land Preservation Foundation (O.W.L.) I was in the middle of my education as a scientist when I first encountered the fluoridation controversy. I was getting a Masters in Geochemistry from the University of Michigan, and I attended a heated City Council meeting in Flagstaff, Arizona. By the end of that meeting I was convinced opponents of water fluoridation were conspiracy-minded loonies.

For decades I never thought much about fluoridation. I believed the doctors who said fluoride prevented tooth decay, so I gave my two children fluoride drops when they were infants. It wasn’t until the Sonoma County Water Coalition hosted a debate in 2009 that I became aware of different information about water fluoridation. Like that memorable Flagstaff meeting, I thought I’d hear “science” from supporters and “crazy stuff” from opponents. But neither side presented any science at all.

What the Studies Show

Exasperated, I started researching for myself. This was familiar terrain: I had published many papers, so I know what it takes to prove a point scientifically, and the data required to get a paper published. I had performed analyses, plotted data and defended my research and interpretations in public forums. I quickly found World Heath Organization data that stunned me:

    Tooth decay has plummeted in developed countries worldwide, regardless of fluoridation.
    Cavity rates are the same — or even lower – in many non-fluoridated countries compared to the U.S.
    The one clear correlation with water fluoridation is disfiguring “dental fluorosis” (supposedly only a cosmetic problem.)

I then proceeded to review a range of scientific papers, including all the most recent research on actual and potential effects of water fluoridation. In study after study I found that differences in tooth decay rates between areas that have fluoridated water supplies for decades, and those that either never fluoridated or stopped fluoridating, were minimal to nonexistent.

Key U.S. studies confirm that ingesting fluoride does not prevent tooth decay:

    1990 National Institute of Dental Research Survey: One of the largest U.S. surveys of tooth decay found no significant difference in tooth decay (less than ½ of 1% of the 128 tooth surfaces in the mouth ) between fluoridated and non-fluoridated populations.
    Several modern U.S. Studies (1997-2001): Tooth decay did not go up when fluoridation was stopped.
    The 2009 National Institutes of Health-funded “Iowa Study”: Cavity levels the same regardless of whether children ingested fluoride or not.

Apply It or Swallow It?

In recent years the differentiation between swallowing fluoride and coating teeth with it has become lost in the discussion. But this differentiation is essential. The overwhelming consensus among scientists, including the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Research Council, is that fluoride works when it’s applied to the tooth surface, NOT when it’s swallowed.

Sonoma County Has provided No Scientific Support for Fluoridation

In 2013, County Health officials provided the Sonoma County Water Coalition with a single study in support of fluoridation by Australian scientists who reviewed worldwide fluoridation studies written in English. But that study is flawed because it failed to compare fluoridated versus non-fluoridated populations, lacked a cavity prevention assessment, and showed an extremely weak correlation insufficient to prove cause-and-effect. Thus far the County has not offered any more definitive data to support its campaign.

How Dis the U.S. Got Sold on Water Fluoridation?

In analyzing early research, it’s clear that the U.S. promoted the spread of water fluoridation before completing definitive studies. I’ve met with this practice of promoting innovations that later prove to have negative public health impacts over and over again in< my scientific career. After the debate, I realized that without solid science to back it up, fluoridation could well represent the same dynamic. And now, having examined the research myself, I’ve concluded that water fluoridation is indeed an echo of past mistakes. Improving children’s dental health is a worthy goal. But before Sonoma County considers water fluoridation, the public must demand the County first prove that it works.

Jane Nielson, Ph.D

8
Food & Water Safety - or lack thereof / 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation
« on: October 29, 2017, 12:32:47 PM »
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/

Introduction

Dr. Paul Connett

In Europe, only Ireland (73%), Poland (1%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), and the U.K. (11%) fluoridate any of their water. Most developed countries, including Japan and 97% of the western European population, do not consume fluoridated water.

In the U.S., about 70% of public water supplies are fluoridated. This equates to approximately 185 million people, which is over half the number of people drinking artificially fluoridated water worldwide. Some countries have areas with high natural fluoride levels in the water. These include India, China and parts of Africa. In these countries measures are being taken to remove the fluoride because of the health problems that fluoride can cause.


Fluoridation is a bad medical practice

1) Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical treatment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies fluoride as a drug when used to prevent or mitigate disease (FDA 2000). As a matter of basic logic, adding fluoride to water for the sole purpose of preventing tooth decay (a non-waterborne disease) is a form of medical treatment. All other water treatment chemicals are added to improve the water’s quality or safety, which fluoride does not do.

2) Fluoridation is unethical. Informed consent is standard practice for all medication, and one of the key reasons why most of Western Europe has ruled against fluoridation. With water fluoridation we are allowing governments to do to whole communities (forcing people to take a medicine irrespective of their consent) what individual doctors cannot do to individual patients.

Put another way: Does a voter have the right to require that their neighbor ingest a certain medication (even if it is against that neighbor’s will)?

3) The dose cannot be controlled. Once fluoride is put in the water it is impossible to control the dose each individual receives because people drink different amounts of water. Being able to control the dose a patient receives is critical. Some people (e.g., manual laborers, athletes, diabetics, and people with kidney disease) drink substantially more water than others.

4) The fluoride goes to everyone regardless of age, health or vulnerability. According to Dr. Arvid Carlsson, the 2000 Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology and one of the scientists who helped keep fluoridation out of Sweden:

“Water fluoridation goes against leading principles of pharmacotherapy, which is progressing from a stereotyped medication — of the type 1 tablet 3 times a day — to a much more individualized therapy as regards both dosage and selection of drugs. The addition of drugs to the drinking water means exactly the opposite of an individualized therapy” (Carlsson 1978).

Along  with 46 other reasons at the link:
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/

13
General Discussion / What You Can’t Say Anymore: In US Gov’t
« on: September 14, 2017, 10:08:00 AM »
https://clarionproject.org/cant-say-anymore-us-govt/

"What You Can’t Say Anymore: In US Gov’t

A top official at the National Security Council (NSC) was fired for a memo he wrote warning about the dangers of radical Islam and its alliance with the radical left.

Rich Higgins, who was formerly with the Pentagon, worked as the director of strategic planning for the NSC until his untimely departure.

Part of his lengthy memo stated:

    “Globalists and Islamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed…Islamists ally with cultural Marxists…[but] Islamists will co-opt the movement in its entirety…

    “Because the left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local, national, and international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through coordinated synchronized interactive narratives…

    “These attack narratives are pervasive, full spectrum, and institutionalized at all levels. They operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies.”

The Atlantic reported Higgins also “pushed for declassification of documents having to do with radical Islam and Iran,” citing a source close to the White House.

One such document, called the “Presidential Study Directive,” allegedly warned in 2010 about the upcoming Arab Spring and detailed the Obama Administration’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist organizations.

Lamenting the lack of education given to government officials about radical Islam, Higgins previously wrote, “National Security officials are prohibited from developing a factual understanding of Islamic threat doctrines, preferring instead to depend upon 5th column Muslim Brotherhood cultural advisors.”

Higgins’ firing is consistent with the beliefs espoused by General H.R. McMaster, who replaced Trump’s original appointee, General Mike Flynn, as head of the NSC.

McMaster believes the “Islamic State is not Islamic,” going so far as to describe jihadists as “really irreligious organizations.” As did former president Obama, he opposes use of any language that connects Islam to terrorism.

McMaster also rejects the notion that jihadists are motivated by religious ideology. Instead, he says they are motivated by “fear,” a “sense of honor” and their “interests,” which he describes as the roots of human conflict for thousands of years. He believes U.S. policy must be based on “understanding those human dimensions.”

McMaster’s influence can be seen in recent speeches by the president, vice president and secretary of defense on the anniversary of 9/11. In a reversal from his campaign rhetoric, none of those addresses mentioned radical Islam.

Yet, in his acceptance speech at the Republican convention, Trump mentioned the Islamic basis of the jihadist threat four times. Similarly, during the campaign itself, Trump regularly attacked Hillary Clinton for declining to use the term “radical Islam.”
https://clarionproject.org/cant-say-anymore-us-govt/

14
https://clarionproject.org/truth-deceptions-calling-linda-sarsour/

Truth and Deception: Calling Out Linda Sarsour on Al Aqsa
By Meira Svirsky Monday, July 24, 2017

How many ways can Linda Sarsour misrepresent the volatile situation between Israel and the Palestinians? And why do we even care?

Sarsour, a Palestinian activist, is the darling of the left, the feminist movement and the BDS movement. Information she spreads is taken at face value; no one usually bothers to check the facts.

Please continue on the article:
https://clarionproject.org/truth-deceptions-calling-linda-sarsour/

15
https://clarionproject.org/secretary-state-disappoints-muslim-brotherhood-qatar/

Secretary of State Shills for Muslim Brotherhood, Qatar

The Trump Administration still hasn’t designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization as it was expected to do. Designation falls under the purview of Secretary of State Tillerson, who has chosen the Muslim Brotherhood and its backers in Qatar and Turkey over their Arab rivals.

Tillerson recently signaled his opposition to designating the Muslim Brotherhood in mid-June. He only has negative things to say about the idea.

His main point is that the Brotherhood’s political parties have representatives in governments like those in Bahrain and Turkey. That is irrelevant. If it was such a problem, Bahrain itself wouldn’t have banned the Brotherhood and the U.S. wouldn’t be dealing with the Lebanese government that has Hezbollah in it, which is designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Tillerson also repeated the “non-violent” and “moderate” Muslim Brotherhood propaganda. He claimed that the Brotherhood’s political parties in governments “have become so by renouncing violence and terrorism.” That was false when the Obama Administration said it, and it is false now.

The disappointment in Tillerson’s position is made exponentially greater by the fact that now is an optimum time to designate the group.

The Arab world is putting unprecedented pressure on Qatar over its support of the Brotherhood and other jihadists in the Islamist swarm. Muslim foes of the Brotherhood are left wondering where the U.S.stands because Trump and Tillerson aren’t on the same page.

Counter-terrorism expert Patrick Poole goes so far as to assert that Tillerson is “sabotaging” Trump’s foreign policy and urges his departure from the administration.

While President Trump expressed his support for the Arab measures against Qatar and unequivocally described Qatar as a major terrorism-financier, Tillerson did the opposite. He described Qatar as “very reasonable” in its reaction to the Arabs’ pressure.

His spokesperson read a scripted statement accusing the Arab states of having ulterior motives, saying the U.S. is “mystified” by their complaints. The State Department even cast doubt on the credibility of the Arabs’ accusations, claiming that they haven’t provided supporting details. Qatar’s lavish sponsorship of terrorism and extremism is uncontestable.

As Poole documents, far from offering support for those Arab states opposing Qatar, Tillerson publicly made moves towards Qatar’s Turkish allies and increased criticism of Qatar’s Saudi adversaries. The Trump Administration also agreed to sell up to 36 fighter jets to Qatar right after the Arabs began their campaign.

Tillerson even signed a counter-terrorism agreement with Qatar, spitting in the faces of the Arab countries fed up with Qatar’s repeated breaking of its promises to change its behavior. Immediately after signing the deal, Qatar reiterated its firm commitment to Hamas (and therefore, the broader Muslim Brotherhood organization of which it is an official branch).

much more:
https://clarionproject.org/secretary-state-disappoints-muslim-brotherhood-qatar/

16
Email from Clarion Project on 7-25, demonstrating how truth is and will continue to be increasingly censored by the Godless, which leaves only the lies from father of lies in the vacuum left:

"Clarion Project's YouTube account has been taken down, silencing Clarion Project's educational work informing the public about the dangers of radicalism.

We appeal to YouTube to reverse this decision and empower us to continue our important work.

We thank our readers for your continued support and look forward to providing incisive hard-hitting video content as soon as this issue is resolved."

17
Messianic Jews who have chosen old covenant law / Galatians
« on: August 04, 2017, 11:54:28 AM »
John 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

Galatians

Galatians 1:1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)    2  And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia:    3  Grace [be] to you and peace from God the Father, and [from] our Lord Jesus Christ,    4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father:    5  To whom [be] glory for ever and ever. Amen.    6  I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:    7  Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.    8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.    9  As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.    10  For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.    11  But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.    12  For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught [it], but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.    13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:    14  And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.    15  But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called [me] by his grace,    16  To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:    17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.    18  Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.    19  But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.    20  Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.    21  Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia;    22  And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:    23  But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.    24  And they glorified God in me.
 
Galatians 2:1 Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with [me] also.    2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.    3  But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:    4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:    5  To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.    6 But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed [to be somewhat] in conference added nothing to me:    7  But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as [the gospel] of the circumcision [was] unto Peter;    8  (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)    9  And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we [should go] unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.    10  Only [they would] that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do.    11  But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.    12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision.    13  And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.    14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before [them] all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?    15  We [who are] Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles,    16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.    17  But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, [is] therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.    18  For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.    19  For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.    20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.    21  I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness [come] by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
 
Galatians 3:1 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?    2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?    3  Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?    4  Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if [it be] yet in vain.    5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, [doeth he it] by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?    6  Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.    7  Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.    8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, [saying], In thee shall all nations be blessed.    9  So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.    10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.    11  But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, [it is] evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12  And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.    13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree:    14  That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.    15  Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though [it be] but a man's covenant, yet [if it be] confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.    16  Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.    17  And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.    18  For if the inheritance [be] of the law, [it is] no more of promise: but God gave [it] to Abraham by promise.    19 Wherefore then [serveth] the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; [and it was] ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.    20  Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.    21 [Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.    22  But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.    23  But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.    24  Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.    25  But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.    26  For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.    27  For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.    28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.    29  And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
 
Galatians 4:1 Now I say, [That] the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;    2  But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.    3  Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:    4  But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,    5  To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.    6  And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.    7  Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.    8  Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.    9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?    10  Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.    11  I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.    12  Brethren, I beseech you, be as I [am]; for I [am] as ye [are]: ye have not injured me at all.    13  Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first.    14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, [even] as Christ Jesus.    15  Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that, if [it had been] possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.    16  Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?    17  They zealously affect you, [but] not well; yea, they would exclude you, that ye might affect them.    18  But [it is] good to be zealously affected always in [a] good [thing], and not only when I am present with you.    19  My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,    20  I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you.    21  Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?    22  For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.    23  But he [who was] of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman [was] by promise.    24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.    25  For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.    26  But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.    27 For it is written, Rejoice, [thou] barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.    28  Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.    29  But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him [that was born] after the Spirit, even so [it is] now.    30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.    31  So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
 
Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.    2  Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.    3  For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.    4  Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.    5  For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.    6  For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.    7  Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?    8  This persuasion [cometh] not of him that calleth you.    9  A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.    10 I have confidence in you through the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded: but he that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be.    11  And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased.    12  I would they were even cut off which trouble you.    13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.    14  For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.    15  But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.    16  [This] I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.    17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.    18  But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.    19  Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,    20  Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,    21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told [you] in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.    22  But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,    23  Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.    24  And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.    25  If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.    26  Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another.
 
Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.    2  Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.    3  For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.    4  But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another.    5  For every man shall bear his own burden.    6  Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.    7  Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.    8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.    9  And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.    10  As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all [men], especially unto them who are of the household of faith.    11  Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.    12 As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ.    13  For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh.    14  But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.    15  For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.    16  And as many as walk according to this rule, peace [be] on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.    17  From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.    18 Brethren, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ [be] with your spirit. Amen. <<[To [the] Galatians written from Rome.]>>

18
If this is what fluoridated tap water does to horses.....what is it doing to us and our kids?
Fluoride poisoned horses
short 8 minute version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9RXfOuylWo

full 33 minute documentary
http://documentarylovers.com/film/poisoned-horses/

19
Fluoride Gate
The inter-governmental agency policy conspiracy that advances this poisoning of the American people with a carcinogen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7U9GJrkrHc
The EPA has known for 5 decades that fluoride negatively affects black and Hispanic people more than others.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway

Poisoned babies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l84eU7oQatI

Mercury and lead synergism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7e69VcvrU8

20
https://fluoridealert.org/articles/phosphate01/
The Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: An Environmental Overview

1. Introduction

They call them “wet scrubbers” – the pollution control devices used by the phosphate industry to capture fluoride gases produced in the production of commercial fertilizer.

In the past, when the industry let these gases escape, vegetation became scorched, crops destroyed, and cattle crippled.

Today, with the development of sophisticated air-pollution control technology, less of the fluoride escapes into the atmosphere, and the type of pollution that threatened the survival of some communities in the 1950s and 60s, is but a thing of the past (at least in the US and other wealthy countries).

However, the impacts of the industry’s fluoride emissions are still being felt, although more subtly, by millions of people – people who, for the most part, do not live anywhere near a phosphate plant.

That’s because, after being captured in the scrubbers, the fluoride acid (hydrofluorosilicic acid), a classified hazardous waste, is barreled up and sold, unrefined, to communities across the country. Communities add hydrofluorosilicic acid to their water supplies as the primary fluoride chemical for water fluoridation.

Even if you don’t live in a community where fluoride is added to water, you’ll still be getting a dose of it through cereal, soda, juice, beer and any other processed food and drink manufactured with fluoridated water.

Meanwhile, if the phosphate industry has its way, it may soon be distributing another of its by-products to communities across the country. That waste product is radium, which may soon be added to a roadbed near you – if the EPA buckles and industry has its way.
https://fluoridealert.org/articles/phosphate01/


"Today, the same gypsum stack which caused this particular spill, is considered by Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection to be “the most serious pollution threat in the state.” That’s because tropical rains over the past couple of years have brought the wastewater to the edge of the stack’s walls.

As noted by the Tampa Tribune, “The gypsum mound is near capacity, and a wet spring or a tropical storm could cause a catastrophic spill.”

To prevent such a spill, which was all but inevitable, the EPA recently agreed to let Florida pursue “Option Z“: To load 500-600 million gallons of the wastewater onto barges and dump it directly into the Gulf of Mexico.

The dumping of the wastewater into the Gulf represents the latest in a series of high-profile embarrasments for Florida’s phosphate industry; one of the most dramatic of which happened on June 15, 1994.

On that day, a massive, 15-story sinkhole appeared in the middle of an 80 million ton gypsum stack. The hole was so big that, according to US News & World Report, it

“could be as big as 2 million cubic feet, enough to swallow 400 railroad boxcars. Local wags call it Disney World’s newest attraction — ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth.'”

But, as US News noted,

“there’s nothing amusing about it. The cave-in dumped 4 million to 6 million cubic feet of toxic and radioactive gypsum and waste water into the Floridan aquifer, which provides 90 percent of the state’s drinking water.”"

21
National Research Council’s findings:
http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/nrc/findings/

NRC’s Findings

The National Research Council’s report concluded that EPA’s safe drinking water standard (4 ppm) for fluoride is unsafe and “should be lowered.” The NRC based this conclusion on its finding that EPA’s 4 ppm standard places a person at increased risk for both tooth damage (severe dental fluorosis) and bone damage (bone fracture). While most of the press coverage of the NRC report focused on NRC’s concerns with teeth and bone, there are many other serious concerns expressed in the NRC report. As evident in the following excerpts, the NRC report lends credence to fluoride’s ability to affect a wide range of systems in the body, particularly the brain and endocrine system. These concerns are further amplified in the NRC’s research recommendations.

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE BRAIN:

To read the NRC’s complete discussion of fluoride’s effect on the brain, click here.

“On the basis of information largely derived from histological, chemical, and molecular studies, it is apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain and the body by direct and indirect means.” p.222

“A few epidemiologic studies of Chinese populations have reported IQ deficits in children exposed to fluoride at 2.5 to 4 mg/L in drinking water. Although the studies lacked sufficient detail for the committee to fully assess their quality and relevance to U.S. populations, the consistency of the results appears significant enough to warrant additional research on the effects of fluoride on intelligence.” p.8

“histopathological changes similar to those traditionally associated with Alzheimer’s disease in people have been seen in rats chronically exposed to AlF.” p.212

“Fluorides also increase the production of free radicals in the brain through several different biological pathways. These changes have a bearing on the possibility that fluorides act to increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.” p.222

“More research is needed to clarify fluoride’s biochemical effects on the brain.” p.222

“The possibility has been raised by the studies conducted in China that fluoride can lower intellectual abilities. Thus, studies of populations exposed to different concentrations of fluoride in drinking water should include measurements of reasoning ability, problem solving, IQ, and short- and long-term memory.” p.223

“Studies of populations exposed to different concentrations of fluoride should be undertaken to evaluate neurochemical changes that may be associated with dementia. Consideration should be given to assessing effects from chronic exposure, effects that might be delayed or occur late-in-life, and individual susceptibility.” p.223

“Additional animal studies designed to evaluate reasoning are needed.” p.223

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE ENDOCRINE SYSTEM:

“In summary, evidence of several types indicates that fluoride affects normal endocrine function or response; the effects of the fluoride-induced changes vary in degree and kind in different individuals. Fluoride is therefore an endocrine disruptor in the broad sense of altering normal endocrine function or response, although probably not in the sense of mimicking a normal hormone. The mechanisms of action remain to be worked out and appear to include both direct and indirect mechanisms, for example, direct stimulation or inhibition of hormone secretion by interference with second messenger function, indirect stimulation or inhibition of hormone secretion by effects on things such as calcium balance, and inhibition of peripheral enzymes that are necessary for activation of the normal hormone.” p.266

“Some of these [endocrine] effects are associated with fluoride intake that is achievable at fluoride concentrations in drinking water of 4 mg/L or less, especially for young children or for individuals with high water intake. Many of the effects could be considered subclinical effects, meaning that they are not adverse health effects. However, recent work on borderline hormonal imbalances and endocrine-disrupting chemicals indicated that adverse health effects, or increased risks for developing adverse effects, might be associated with seemingly mild imbalances or perturbations in hormone concentrations. Further research is needed to explore these possibilities.” p.8

“Further effort is necessary to characterize the direct and indirect mechanisms of fluoride’s action on the endocrine system and the factors that determine the response, if any, in a given individual.” p.266

“The effects of fluoride on various aspects of endocrine function should be examined further, particularly with respect to a possible role in the development of several diseases or mental states in the United States.” p.267

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE THYROID:

To read the NRC’s complete discussion of fluoride’s effect on the thyroid, click here.

“several lines of information indicate an effect of fluoride exposure on thyroid function.” p.234

“it is difficult to predict exactly what effects on thyroid function are likely at what concentration of fluoride exposure and under what circumstances.” p.234-5

“Fluoride exposure in humans is associated with elevated TSH concentrations, increased goiter prevalence, and altered T4 and T3 concentrations; similar effects on T4 and T3 are reported in experimental animals..” p.262

“In humans, effects on thyroid function were associated with fluoride exposures of 0.05-0.13 mg/kg/day when iodine intake was adequate and 0.01-0.03 mg/kg/day when iodine intake was inadequate.” p.262-3

“The recent decline in iodine intake in the United States (CDC 2002d; Larsen et al. 2002) could contribute to increased toxicity of fluoride for some individuals.” p.263

“Intake of nutrients such as calcium and iodine often is not reported in studies of fluoride effects. The effects of fluoride on thyroid function, for instance, might depend on whether iodine intake is low, adequate, or high, or whether dietary selenium is adequate.” p.265

FLUORidE’S EFFECTS ON THE PINEAL GLAND:

“The single animal study of pineal function indicates that fluoride exposure results in altered melatonin production and altered timing of sexual maturity (Table 8-1). Whether fluoride affects pineal function in humans remains to be demonstrated. The two studies of menarcheal age in humans show the possibility of earlier menarche in some individuals exposed to fluoride, but no definitive statement can be made. Recent information on the role of the pineal organ in humans suggests that any agent that affects pineal function could affect human health in a variety of ways, including effects on sexual maturation, calcium metabolism, parathyroid function, postmenopausal osteoporosis, cancer, and psychiatric disease.” p.264

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON INSULIN SECRETION/DIABETES:

“The conclusion from the available studies is that sufficient fluoride exposure appears to bring about increases in blood glucose or impaired glucose tolerance in some individuals and to increase the severity of some types of diabetes. In general, impaired glucose metabolism appears to be associated with serum or plasma fluoride concentrations of about 0.1 mg/L or greater in both animals and humans. In addition, diabetic individuals will often have higher than normal water intake, and consequently, will have higher than normal fluoride intake for a given concentration of fluoride in drinking water. An estimated 16-20 million people in the U.S. have diabetes mellitus; therefore, any role of fluoride exposure in the development of impaired glucose metabolism or diabetes is potentially significant.” p.260

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM:

“Nevertheless, patients who live in either an artificially fluoridated community or a community where the drinking water naturally contains fluoride at 4 mg/L have all accumulated fluoride in their skeletal systems and potentially have very high fluoride concentrations in their bones. The bone marrow is where immune cells develop and that could affect humoral immunity and the production of antibodies to foreign chemicals.” p.293-4

“There is no question that fluoride can affect the cells involved in providing immune responses. The question is what proportion, if any, of the population consuming drinking water containing fluoride at 4.0 mg/L on a regular basis will have their immune systems compromised? Not a single epidemiologic study has investigated whether fluoride in the drinking water at 4 mg/L is associated with changes in immune function. Nor has any study examined whether a person with an immunodeficiency disease can tolerate fluoride ingestion from drinking water.” p.295

“bone concentrates fluoride and the blood-borne progenitors could be exposed to exceptionally high fluoride concentrations. Thus, more research needs to be carried out before one can state that drinking water containing fluoride at 4 mg/L has no effect on the immune system.” p.295

“it is important to consider subpopulations that accumulate large concentrations of fluoride in their bones (e.g., renal patients). When bone turnover occurs, the potential exists for immune system cells and stem cells to be exposed to concentrations of fluoride in the interstitial fluids of bone that are higher than would be found in serum. From an immunologic standpoint, individuals who are immunocompromised (e.g., AIDS, transplant, and bone-marrow-replacement patients) could be at greater risk of the immunologic effects of fluoride.” p.302

“Within 250 µm of a site of resorption, it is possible to encounter progenitor cells that give rise to bone, blood, and fat. Thus, one must assume that these cells would be exposed to high concentrations of fluoride. At this time, it is not possible to predict what effect this exposure would have on the functioning of skeletal elements, hematopoiesis, and adipose formation.” p.142

“It is paramount that careful biochemical studies be conducted to determine what fluoride concentrations occur in the bone and surrounding interstitial fluids from exposure to fluoride in drinking water at up to 4 mg/L, because bone marrow is the source of the progenitors that produce the immune system cells.” p.303

“In addition, studies could be conducted to determine what percentage of immunocompromised subjects have adverse reactions when exposed to fluoride in the range of 1-4 mg/L in drinking water.” p.303

FLUORIDE’S INTERACTIVE/SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS (w/ IODINE, ALUMINUM, ETC):

“Intake of nutrients such as calcium and iodine often is not reported in studies of fluoride effects. The effects of fluoride on thyroid function, for instance, might depend on whether iodine intake is low, adequate, or high, or whether dietary selenium is adequate.” p.265

“Better characterization of exposure to fluoride is needed in epidemiology studies investigating potential effects. Important exposure aspects of such studies would include the following: collecting data on general dietary status and dietary factors that could influence exposure or effects, such as calcium, iodine, and aluminum intakes.” p.88

“Available information now indicates a role for aluminum in the interaction of fluoride on the second messenger system; thus, differences in aluminum exposure might explain some of the differences in response to fluoride exposures among individuals and populations.” p.265

“With the increasing prevalence of acid rain, metal ions such as aluminum become more soluble and enter our day-to-day environment; the opportunity for bioactive forms of AlF to exist has increased in the past 100 years. Human exposure to aluminofluorides can occur when a person ingests both a fluoride source (e.g., fluoride in drinking water) and an aluminum source; sources of human exposure to aluminum include drinking water, tea, food residues, infant formula, aluminum-containing antacids or medications, deodorants, cosmetics, and glassware.” p.51

“Further research should include characterization of both the exposure conditions and the physiological conditions (for fluoride and for aluminum or beryllium) under which aluminofluoride and beryllofluoride complexes can be expected to occur in humans as well as the biological effects that could result.” p.52

“Another possible explanation for increased blood lead concentrations which has not been examined is the effect of fluoride intake on calcium metabolism; a review by Goyer (1995) indicates that higher blood and tissue concentrations of lead occur when the diet is low in calcium. Increased fluoride exposure appears to increase the dietary requirement for calcium (see Chapter 8); in addition, the substitution of tap-water based beverages (e.g., soft drinks or reconstituted juices) for dairy products would result in both increased fluoride intake and decreased calcium intake.” p.52

“[G]iven the expected presence of fluoride ion (from any fluoridation source) and silica (native to the water) in any fluoridated tap water, it would be useful to examine what happens when that tap water is used to make acidic beverages or products (commercially or in homes), especially fruit juice from concentrate, tea, and soft drinks. Although neither Urbansky (2002) nor Morris (2004) discusses such beverages, both indicate that at pH < 5, SiF6 2- would be present, so it seems reasonable to expect that some SiF6 2- would be present in acidic beverages but not in the tap water used to prepare the beverages. Consumption rates of these beverages are high for many people, and therefore the possibility of biological effects of SiF62-, as opposed to free fluoride ion, should be examined.” p.53

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM:

“A few human studies suggested that high concentrations of fluoride exposure might be associated with alterations in reproductive hormones, effects on fertility, and developmental outcomes, but design limitations make those studies insufficient for risk evaluation.” p.8

“the relationship between fertility and fluoride requires additional study.” p.193

FLUORIDE & DOWN’S SYNDROME:

“The possible association of cytogenetic effects with fluoride exposure suggests that Down’s syndrome is a biologically plausible outcome of exposure.” p.197

“A reanalysis of data on Down’s syndrome and fluoride by Takahashi (1998) suggested a possible association in children born to young mothers. A case-control study of the incidence of Down’s syndrome in young women and fluoride exposure would be useful for addressing that issue. However, it may be particularly difficult to study the incidence of Down’s syndrome today given increased fetal genetic testing and concerns with confidentiality.” p.204

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM:

“The numerous fluoridation studies in the past failed to rigorously test for changes in GI symptoms and there are no studies on drinking water containing fluoride at 4 mg/L in which GI symptoms were carefully documented.” p.269

“GI effects appear to have been rarely evaluated in the fluoride supplement studies that followed the early ones in the 1950s and 1960s.” p.274

“The table suggests that fluoride at 4 mg/L in the drinking water results in approximately 1% of the population experiencing GI symptoms.” p.274

“Whether fluoride activates G proteins in the gut epithelium at very low doses (e.g., from fluoridated water at 4.0 mg/L) and has significant effects on the gut cell chemistry must be examined in biochemical studies.” p.280

“There are a few case reports of GI upset in subjects exposed to drinking water fluoridated at 1 mg/L. Those effects were observed in only a small number of cases, which suggest hypersensitivity. However, the available data are not robust enough to determine whether that is the case.” p.295

“Studies are needed to evaluate gastric responses to fluoride from natural sources at concentrations up to 4 mg/L and from artificial sources.” p.302

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE LIVER:

“It is possible that a lifetime ingestion of 5-10 mg/day from drinking water containing 4 mg/L might turn out to have long-term effects on the liver, and this should be investigated in future epidemiologic studies.” p.293

“The effect of low doses of fluoride on kidney and liver enzyme functions in humans needs to be carefully documented in communities exposed to different concentrations of fluoride in drinking water.” p.303

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE KIDNEY:

“Human kidneys… concentrate fluoride as much as 50-fold from plasma to urine. Portions of the renal system may therefore be at higher risk of fluoride toxicity than most soft tissues.” p.280

“Early water fluoridation studies did not carefully assess changes in renal function.” p.280

“future studies should be directed toward determining whether kidney stone formation is the most sensitive end point on which to base the MCLG.” p.281

“On the basis of studies carried out on people living in regions where there is endemic fluorosis, ingestion of fluoride at 12 mg per day would increase the risk for some people to develop adverse renal effects.” p.281

“The effect of low doses of fluoride on kidney and liver enzyme functions in humans needs to be carefully documented in communities exposed to different concentrations of fluoride in drinking water.” p.303

FLUORIDE & CANCER:

“Fluoride appears to have the potential to initiate or promote cancers, particularly of the bone, but the evidence to date is tentative and mixed (Tables 10-4 and 10-5). As noted above, osteosarcoma is of particular concern as a potential effect of fluoride because of (1) fluoride deposition in bone, (2) the mitogenic effect of fluoride on bone cells, (3) animal results described above, and (4) pre-1993 publication of some positive, as well as negative, epidemiologic reports on associations of fluoride exposure with osteosarcoma risk.“ p.336

“Because fluoride stimulates osteoblast proliferation, there is a theoretical risk that it might induce a malignant change in the expanding cell population. This has raised concerns that fluoride exposure might be an independent risk factor for new osteosarcomas.” p.134

“Osteosarcoma presents the greatest a priori plausibility as a potential cancer target site because of fluoride’s deposition in bone, the NTP animal study findings of borderline increased osteosarcomas in male rats, and the known mitogenic effect of fluoride on bone cells in culture (see Chapter 5). Principles of cell biology indicate that stimuli for rapid cell division increase the risks for some of the dividing cells to become malignant, either by inducing random transforming events or by unmasking malignant cells that previously were in nondividing states.” p.322

“Further research on a possible effect of fluoride on bladder cancer risk should be conducted.” p.338

22
Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88pfVo3bZLY

Fluoride: Poison On Tap - Full Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqstwfKGzPI

http://fluorideaction.net/

Fluoride Deception
https://youtu.be/Q3y8uwtxrHo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hW0_UMtsb4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hW0_UMtsb4

Civilized, sane, countries that ban or reject flouride
http://fluoridation.com/c-country.htm


""The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends that 1 part per million (ppm) of fluoride ions is acceptable in drinking water, but above 2 ppm is considered a serious health risk," said Sourav Saha, an assistant professor in FSU's Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and its Integrative NanoScience Institute. "Because fluoride is carcinogenic even at such small doses, a sensor is needed to detect fluoride selectively at very low concentrations and in the presence of other naturally occurring and biologically important ions.""
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/12/101209164148.htm

In other words "acceptable" levels of fluoride only half poison the people who drink it.

"Fluoride Content of Various Processed Beverages
The mass fluoridation of water supplies thus results in the mass fluoridation of processed drinks and foods and drinks."
http://fluoridealert.org/content/processed-drinks/

Too little too late:
U.S. Lowers Recommended Fluoride Levels in Drinking Water
http://www.webmd.com/oral-health/news/20150427/us-lowers-recommended-fluoride-levels-in-drinking-water#1

An Inconvenient Tooth - Fluoride Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh-oeu2L8yM

23
General Discussion / Does Facebook Support Terror?
« on: July 19, 2017, 01:00:23 PM »
"Does Facebook Support Terror?

By Meira Svirsky Tuesday, July 18, 2017

In a move that has become unfortunately typical of Facebook, the social media giant has shut the page of the Counter Jihad Coalition, a group that educates the public on political Islam and exposes the human rights abuses inherent in sharia law.

When the notification came that the group had violated the company’s “Community Standards,” they were told that the page would be taken down for just 24 hours. One week later, the page remains closed.

Facebook also recently restricted and then shut down the public pages of Ex-Muslim of North America and Atheist Republic, groups that both provide support to those who leave Islam and often face persecution because of it.

While Islamists most likely mobilized to get the pages shut down by getting their followers to “flag” pages for violation, it is ultimately up to Facebook to check the claims and make the decision.

Meaning, the buck stops with Facebook.

These moves have not been made in a vacuum. Just recently, a high-level executive at Facebook met with the interior minister of Pakistan over the Islamist country’s demands to get “blasphemous” content off the platform.

Pakistan was pleased with the results of the meeting.

Tests have been conducted, for example, to see if Facebook is wielding its enormous power in the cyber world to simply flag what they deem hate speech or a promote a political agenda.

Unfortunately, based on results of experiments, for example, where identical content that demonized Palestinians versus Israelis, we saw that (after it was flagged) Facebook only shut down the anti-Muslim pages but allowed site promoting vile slander against Israel to remain posted.

And despite the fact that the Facebook claims to block content that violates their “community standards,” a case was filed by 20,000 Israelis charging that Facebook allows Palestinian terrorists to incite violent attacks against Israelis and Jews.

Facebook can rightly claim that, as a private company, they are not subject to America’s laws which guarantee freedom of speech – laws which, not incidentally, also protect the right to engage in hate speech (with the exception of incitement to immediate violence).

Ideally, those with a political outlook who are being shut down by Facebook should form an alternative social media platform.

However, Facebook should not be fooled into thinking that they are “doing good in the world” by siding with Islamists who use the politically constructed cry of Islamophobia to further their goal of a worldwide implementation of sharia law.

Moreover, as it has been unequivocally demonstrated, Islamist ideology is almost always a precursor to its violent manifestation.

By shutting down the voices that challenge both the violent and non-violent displays of political Islam, Facebook is de facto supporting terrorism – which certainly goes against its “community standards.”
https://clarionproject.org/facebook-support-terror/

24
General Discussion / Spend a Summer of Jihad With Hamas
« on: July 18, 2017, 12:06:18 PM »
https://clarionproject.org/spend-a-summer-of-jihad-with-hamas/

"Spend a Summer of Jihad With Hamas

By Meira Svirsky Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Close to 120,000 Palestinian children will attend camps this summer run by Hamas, which gained control of the Gaza Strip 10 years ago, reported Breitbart, citing figures from the terrorist organization. In addition, tens of thousands more will participate in other camps run by jihadi groups.

The children will receive weapons and military training – including live shooting exercises — in addition to indoctrination against Jews and Israelis.

As in previous years, graduation ceremonies where the children show off their “skills” will be held in front of Hamas officials.

Openly stating their goals to train the next generation of militants, Usama Almuzeyni, a Hamas official, said, “The movement strives, through the summer camps, to train an entire generation to work for the liberation of Palestine.”

The theme of this year’s camps is “To Jerusalem We Come.” Almuzeyni said this was “to make it clear that Hamas faces one direction, and that is Jerusalem and occupied Palestine.”

Meanwhile, a recently-released U.N. report noted that under Hamas’ leadership, the Gaza Strip has become unliveable for its two-million residents — between lack of healthcare, education, electricity and fresh water and declining incomes, reported Reuters.

“Across the board we’re watching de-development in slow motion,” said Robert Piper, a U.N. coordinator for humanitarian aid and development activities in Gaza."

25
Islam - General / Was Muhammad Visited by the Angel Gabriel?
« on: July 16, 2017, 10:11:03 AM »
Since Muhammad himself believed it was a demon, it's a cinch he didn't come up with that idea on his own. I thought it was his wife Khadijah who came up with the suggestion, but apparently through Waraqa bin Naufal, the occult Ebionite Priest who came up with the idea.
Ran across a couple of sites in a quick search. Didn't read them through.

"What has happened to me? I am afraid for myself! However, Khadija and on the advice of lbn Neafal her cousin managed to convince Muhammad that the spirit was Gabriel. But the spirit did not introduce itself as the angel Gabriel."
http://www.muslimhope.com/TestTheSpirit.htm

https://www.thespiritofislam.com/books/6-islam-muhmmad-quran/59-muhammad-call.html

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39