The worship you talk about is not of the Black Stone....
Was the black stone one of the 360 idols that the pagans venerated at the kaaba before Mohammed?
Yes or no?
I seek refuge in ALLAH from satan
I begin in the name of ALLAH the most merciful the most benefcent
All praise is due to ALLAH the creator of the entire Univerese
I obviously dont know how to answer you,....
That's right, you don't know how to answer because the ugly truth is apparent. You have no love of truth but rather a love of lies, because you follow the father of lies - Satan - through his prophet Mohammed.
The answer, of course, is a simple and undeniable "YES"!
You VENERATE, by bowing toward and circumambulating, the very same black stone idol that was one of the 360 idols that the pagans venerated and circumambulated before Mohammed.http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1050.15
How is it that you seem to believe that simply repeating false nonsense, that you copy and pasted again, will somehow magically make it come true?
Even repeat posting Gibbon's misunderstanding of the very historical record that you denigrated!
.....regarding historical and archeological evidence from pagans, it is obviously a test of my emaan (faith) and a clear indication of your (Kufr) you do not present evidence that Makkah did not exist othre than the speculations of Dr Amari that he gets from pagan greek and Roman writers, and many scholars differ from his opinion and contradict everything he says:
Next AnnaMuslim goes on to quote the 7th century Quran of all things!
I am moving your repeat post to spam where you can revisit it. http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1562.0
Please copy and paste, ONE AT A TIME, any points that were not already addressed the last times you posted it.http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1132.msg6464#msg6464http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1138.15http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1539.msg6488#msg6488
You invited questions about Islam, but then you don't answer them. Why do you suppose that is?http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1138.msg6529#msg6529
Otherwise you are under obligation to present the "....evidence from Hindus and Arabs and Persians that the Ka'aba existed long before Christianity ...." that you claimed I "refuted".
DID YOU READ THE HINDU ACCOUNTS OF HOW THEY BELIEVE THE KA'ABA TO BE A HINDU TEMPLE FROM ABOUT 7000 YEARS AGO, THAT ARABIA ONCE WAS PART OF THE HINDUSTAN EMPIRE?
So far, AFTER
you made your false accusation against me, all you presented was a 1990 MUSLIM'S false exegesis of Hindu scriptures and litany of false presumptions that followed.http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1138.msg6476#msg6476
Just like the false exegesis that you engaged inhttp://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1138.msg6366#msg6366Before
bringing it you suggested that I "refuted" "evidence". Of course you had not presented evidence, nor to my knowledge does such evidence exist. So how could I have "refuted" it?
A late 20th century pop-paper spun by a Muslim on Hindu scripture - without historical reference - is no more historical than the Islamic history creators of the 7th and 8th century Hadith fiction, before him.
Like the Islamic "Gee even though they were written over a thousand years apart, the HEBREW name Baca, is kinda like the ARABIC name Bakka, so well, if we suggest that the name Bakka really means Mecca, then, golly that must mean the the Old Testament is referring to the temple Mecca that is 1200 miles from the temple in Jerusalem! Yea like dat! Let's ignore the rest of the context and present our "proof"!"http://brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=1313.0